Cáceres and Salamanca are separated by just 200 kilometers, yet the journey takes up to seven hours in the best of cases, necessitating a detour through Madrid. This peculiar situation highlights one of Spain’s largest railway gaps. This is a striking example of how certain regions in the country suffer from historical neglect, particularly concerning their train services.

This scenario isn’t unique to Cáceres and Salamanca; similar cases exist across Spain, like the route from Murcia to Granada. However, the loss of the Silver Route has been especially devastating. Once a vital railway corridor in western Spain, its closure over 40 years ago has left many communities longing for its revival. Today, advocacy groups continue to fight for its reopening.

A Line Born to Fail

The Silver Route extended from Seville to Gijón, passing through key cities like Mérida, Cáceres, Salamanca, León, and Oviedo. Initially designed as a significant railway corridor for both passengers and goods, it aimed to alleviate the pressure on Spain’s major economic centers. This route was a visionary attempt to enhance connectivity, created far away from cities like Madrid, Bilbao, or Barcelona.

The foundation of this ambitious project can be traced back to a contract signed in Paris in 1877 to construct a railway between Palazuelo (currently the Monfragüe station) and Astorga. Though it was an ambitious initiative that traversed many unpopulated areas, it sought to link the northern region of Extremadura with Salamanca, Zamora, and León.

Between 1893 and 1896, the railway sections that would form the backbone of the Silver Route were inaugurated. This crucial axis offered a vital link to the south, connecting to the Mérida-Seville line, and extended to the north with the Venta de Baños-Gijón route.

However, the line soon fell into obscurity. Its lack of a major city to support it and absence of direct access to a significant port led to its decline. The government failed to justify investments necessary for modernization and electrification. Consequently, the challenging route lost its charm for passengers and freight operators alike.

Although the line managed to survive the Civil War, much-needed investments never materialized. While iron bridges were replaced with steel in 1933, significant efforts remained sidelined. Local media report numerous derailments and accidents as a consequence of inadequate maintenance.

After years of operating under subpar conditions, the line officially closed in 1984. By then, trains ran at an average speed of barely 50 km/h, reflecting a stark decline from the operational efficiency witnessed at its inception. A tragic bus accident in 1981 further solidified the decision to cease operations, marking an unfortunate end to decades of inadequate funding.

The AVE to Extremadura is the mirror of Spanish railway anachronism: unelectrified tracks, Iberian gauge and passage times of 1970

Revival Efforts

Currently, a connection between Cáceres and Seville remains operational, albeit a single-lane and unelectrified railway. The section linking Salamanca and Gijón is still in place, yet a notable gap exists between Cáceres and Salamanca. While the railways have been transformed into Greenways—paths for walking, running, or cycling—these initiatives fall short of restoring the much-needed train services.

In 2023, several city councils, including those of Salamanca and Cáceres, formally demanded the return of train services. The institutions emphasized that the revival of this railway would foster employment opportunities, enhance logistics, and help mitigate depopulation in these regions.

"The train to Extremadura... let Renfe take it": the Government's hopeless lament against railway liberalization

The justification for these demands includes practical advantages, such as the feasibility of providing a 4G network cover along 90% of the route between Plasencia and Salamanca. Furthermore, revitalizing train services could offer an eco-friendly alternative for transporting goods to and from the Atlantic ports without the need to touch Madrid.

Attempts to resurrect the Silver Route have faced several hurdles. For instance, previous administrations, including those of José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and José María Aznar, made promises to restore the line, but they remain unfulfilled. A significant barrier is that the current Western Corridor doesn’t align with EU transport plans, leaving the area in a logistical void.

The Trans-European Transport Network appears to overlook the gap between Cáceres and Salamanca, further complicating the prospects for revival regardless of whether it’s for passengers or freight.

In response, community organizations, along with local councils, are mobilizing advocacy campaigns to bring attention to this issue, hoping for investments as minimal as €1.9 billion—pales in comparison to the €8 billion allocated to other corridors, like the Mediterranean.

Reviving the Silver Route is vital for connecting the Atlantic Corridor with the southern Spanish regions, offering new pathways for economic exchange and development.

The EU wants to connect Madrid with Paris by AVE in 2035. Or in 2042 if you ask France

However, prospects are dim since the government has yet to present a feasibility report to the EU within the set deadlines, casting doubt on the future of these efforts. As time passes, local communities continue their struggle for the return of this critical railway connection that promises to mitigate decades of neglect.

Photo | Pablo Nieto Abad and Surround

In Xataka | Madrid and Lisbon will be linked by the AVE. It will only arrive (if it arrives) 24 years late.



General News – 2