
Actualizado

Actualizado
The Spanish government’s current situation , lacking a formal Budget Law , has led to the controversial use of decrees to award grants to various projects deemed of “exceptional public interest.” However, critics argue that this practice smells of arbitrary power, with awards being distributed discretionarily by multiple ministries. The process notably requires the prior approval of the First Vice President of the Government and the confirmed Deputy Secretary General of the PSOE, María Jesús Montero .
Investigations of decrees published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) by the ministries responsible for Transport and Ecological Transition reveal troubling details about grant allocations. The most substantial funding was requested by the previously incarcerated Santos Cerdán, the former Secretary of the Organization of the PSOE. He played a pivotal role in one significant decree, numbered 1088/2024 , which was signed on October 22 by Minister Óscar Puente with the crucial backing from Montero.
This decree allocates up to 40 million euros for the “duplication of the Belate and Almandoz tunnels” in Navarra. It’s noteworthy as it marks the largest financial grant awarded to a single autonomous community during this legislative session, even though Navarra has its own financing mechanisms . This funding enabled the socialist government of María Chivite to launch a public tender, ultimately won by the consortium of Acciona, Osés , and Servinabar. The latter company, allegedly controlled by Cerdán, raised eyebrows after Cerdán admitted in court that he had signed a purchase agreement for a 45% stake in it, only to retract his commitment later.
The owner of Servinabar, Antxon Alonso , is due to testify in the Supreme Court about why he did not dissolve this agreement if Cerdán had indeed requested such action. Meanwhile, the Civil Guard’s UCO has contended that Cerdán was managing Servinabar’s operations. Chivite conceded that without the state grant, the project wouldn’t have proceeded, and she sought Cerdán’s assistance to secure funding from the central government, although she claims she was unaware of his involvement with the awarded consortium.
It is striking that, from all the public works deemed necessary in Spain, none have warranted a specific decree with such significant funding since Pedro Sánchez took office. The next largest grant is merely 5.2 million euros , allocated for “safety works” in the defunct mining site called El Terronal in Asturias, approved on May 28, 2024 , by the former Vice President Teresa Ribera , with Montero’s endorsement.
Further scrutiny reveals that direct decrees for regions governed by the Popular Party (PP) are hard to find. For example, officials in the Madrid Transport Office have reported receiving no financial support for public works. They only cite a 8.3 million euro grant from the Housing Ministry for the relocation of families in Cañada Real .
The decree concerning the Belate tunnels is defended by the Transport Ministry as an “exceptional ” decision driven by solid reasons of public interest. Specifically, it highlights the necessity to align the tunnels with EU safety standards. Although their argument is logical, one wonders if more urgent projects exist that would demand similar or greater efforts and funding.
Interestingly, the UCO is embroiled in corruption investigations linked to the Cerdán case. It has surfaced that contracts have been secured through unauthorized channels, involving parties like the Fernández brothers, whose business benefitted from European funds. The judge overseeing the case has expressed frustration with the evasive testimonies of the parties involved, suggesting that significant legal ramifications may arise.
The implications of these controversial funding decrees cast a long shadow over the current administration. As scrutiny intensifies from various stakeholders, the government may be forced to reconsider its strategies regarding public financial allocations. This situation, alongside ongoing investigations, could compel a reevaluation of transparency and accountability within the political landscape.