Federal Justice Halts Closure of Over 600 INTI Services
The Federal Civil, Commercial and Administrative Litigation Court No. 2 of San Martín has intervened to partially suspend the application of Resolution No. 42/2026, which mandated the closure of more than 600 services provided by the National Institute of Industrial Technology (INTI). This judicial action comes shortly after the national government’s controversial decision.
Judicial Ruling in Favor of Workers
Surrogate Judge Elpidio Portocarrero Tezanos Pinto made a significant ruling favoring a precautionary measure taken by the State Workers Association (ATE). The measure was aimed at preventing the implementation of the government’s order to close services outlined in the Official Gazette. The court ruled that INTI must refrain from executing any administrative acts, including dismissals, transfers, or modifications of functions.
One of the most critical components of the ruling is the order that no INTI employees should be dismissed from their positions. The court mandated that the government must ensure the “effective occupation of all agents whose functions are affected” while maintaining their current roles and remuneration as of April 14, 2026.
Continuity of Services and Programs
In addition to protecting employment, the ruling also specified that existing programs related to technical assistance, testing, certification, and technological transfer would continue under INTI’s purview. This decision not only safeguards jobs but also protects essential services that play a crucial role in national industry standards.
Rodolfo Aguiar, the general secretary of ATE, expressed optimism regarding the ruling. He stated that it represents a “historic triumph for the state,” halting what could have been mass layoffs at the institute.
Background of Resolution 42/2026
Resolution 42/2026, published on April 16, was ostensibly aimed at enhancing state efficiency and optimizing the allocation of public funds. The government argued that many services provided by INTI overlapped with private sector offerings and therefore lacked effective demand.
The resolution outlined a plan for the “orderly transition” and suppression of certain services deemed unnecessary. It aimed to ensure the completion of all existing agreements, work orders, and contractual commitments, providing continuity for current users and safeguarding their rights.
Implications of Judicial Decisions
The court’s ruling is pivotal in the ongoing struggle between government policy and worker rights. Aguiar emphasized that adherence to the law and the National Constitution is vital for governing. He deemed the decision a substantial advance against illegal dismissals and state dismantling practices.
The ruling to reverse the government’s resolution not only protects jobs but also enforces a legal framework that mandates accountability from state institutions.
Conclusion
The Federal Justice’s decision serves as a crucial checkpoint for government policies affecting public sector employment and services. Key aspects of the ruling emphasize the need for balance between efficiency and worker rights, showcasing the judiciary’s role in maintaining fairness. As the situation unfolds, the implications will extend beyond INTI, resonating across various sectors reliant on government services and support.