Yahir Acuña on Trial for Alleged Illicit Enrichment
The Investigative Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice has summoned Yahir Acuña, the mayor of Sincelejo, for an investigation into alleged illicit enrichment tied to his tenure as a congressman from 2010 to 2018. The legal proceedings are set to take place on June 19, just days before the presidential runoff elections in Colombia.
Background on the Investigation
Judge Francisco Farfán heads the Special Investigative Chamber of the Supreme Court and is overseeing the case against Acuña. The investigation focuses on the periods during which he served as a representative for Sucre under the “One Hundred Percent for Colombia” movement. There are claims of an unexplained increase in his assets during this time, raising suspicions about potential corruption and illicit enrichment.
The core of the case investigates possible connections between Acuña’s wealth growth and corrupt activities linked to contract awards during his congressional tenure. Reports suggest that he may have solicited commissions in exchange for contract allocations.
Previous Allegations
This isn’t the first time Acuña has faced legal scrutiny. His name has previously appeared in investigations regarding alleged connections to paramilitary groups in Colombia. In 2010, he was implicated in cases related to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC). Additionally, in 2015, authorities seized a substantial sum of money—approximately $480 to $516 million—from a vehicle traveling to Corozal, which raised further questions about potential illicit enrichment.
Despite past allegations and investigations, Acuña has consistently denied wrongdoing, claiming that these inquiries are politically motivated.
Current Controversies
Despite being embroiled in legal challenges, Acuña continues to serve as mayor and is actively involved in city affairs. Recently, he received authorization from the local council to travel to Mexico and the United States from June 2 to July 1, 2026, seeking to explore possibilities for Sincelejo to host international events, including those connected to the upcoming 2026 FIFA World Cup.
His upcoming absence has drawn criticism from political figures and citizens alike, particularly as it coincides with pressing local issues. His departure was approved with 16 votes in favor by the council, amid concerns that he is neglecting the city’s needs while pursuing international engagements.
Conclusion
Yahir Acuña’s impending trial highlights ongoing concerns regarding transparency and accountability within local governance. His situation serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by public servants in staying above board amidst allegations of corruption. As the legal proceedings unfold, the citizens of Sincelejo—and indeed the entire nation—will be closely watching to see how this story develops.