Witnesses Speak on “Very Brother” Rumors Surrounding David Sánchez
Overview of the Testimonies
A recent hearing in Badajoz has brought to light the controversial expression “very brother”, first referenced in the context of David Sánchez and his role within the Badajoz Provincial Conservatories. Witness statements from former directors have revealed insights into the accusations surrounding the circumstances of Sánchez’s hiring and the creation of a coordinator position that many claim was anomalous.
Evaristo Valentí’s Insights
Evaristo Valentí, who was the director of the ‘Bonifacio Gil’ conservatory in 2017—the year Sánchez was hired—made notable statements during the proceedings. Valentí indicated that he had heard rumors suggesting that David Sánchez was vying for a position that ultimately went to a relative of the President of the Government. He mentioned an email containing the term “el hermanísimo,” suggesting a connection to Sánchez, although he did not find it significant at the time.
Valentí expressed his discontent over the coordinator position itself, describing it as unnecessary and outside the established legal framework. “I needed a piano teacher, not a coordinator,” he stated, emphasizing his concern over the creation of this role. Nonetheless, he later acknowledged that Sánchez’s professional qualifications aligned perfectly with what the position required.
Contrasting Views from María del Rosario Mayoral
María del Rosario Mayoral, who took over the conservatory directorship after Valentí (from 2020 to 2025), also shared her perspective. She confirmed that she had not heard the “very brother” rumors before Sánchez arrived. This admission echoes Valentí’s remarks, as both seem to hold a common belief regarding the credibility of the rumors before Sánchez’s employment.
Despite the accusations against him, both Valentí and Mayoral noted that the coordination role was beneficial for their conservatories, providing necessary support for the growing workload. However, both directors admitted that formal coordination meetings with David Sánchez were infrequent, raising questions about the effectiveness of the new position.
Yolanda Sánchez’s Account
Yolanda Sánchez, head of the ‘Juan Vázquez’ conservatory, also contributed to the dialogue. She recollected an email from May 2017 that contained the “very brother” nomenclature, suggesting a connection that she initially dismissed. She noted that Valentí was the one who tied that reference to David Sánchez but lacked clarity on whether Sánchez had applied for the job or if the position was indeed intended for him.
Sánchez also pointed out that although there were whispers of David’s name being circulated, she believed his role effectively addressed the conservatories’ workload challenges.
Court’s Direction and Verdict Implications
The president of the Court, José Antonio Patrocinio Pérez, has frequently urged the parties to concentrate on the factual elements of the case. His insistence on maintaining a structured approach indicates the serious nature of the proceedings and could have lasting implications for all parties involved, including David Sánchez.
As the case unfolds, the relevance of these testimonies could play a crucial role in determining whether the controversies linked to Sánchez’s hiring are substantiated or simply rumors lacking credible evidence.