Magaly Medina Takes Legal Action Against Former Lawyer Iván Paredes
On April 20, during a live episode of Magaly TV La Firme, host Magaly Medina confronted serious allegations regarding her former lawyer, Iván Paredes. Accompanied by her current attorney, Fernando Ugaz, she expressed deep concern over Paredes’s recent actions as he represents figures now suing her.
The Origins of the Conflict
Magaly made it clear that this situation not only surprised her, but also raised ethical questions. “I’m with my lawyer, Dr. Fernando Ugaz, who has been defending me for quite some time now. This string of lawsuits is headed by someone who worked with me and was my lawyer in many cases,” she stated, highlighting Paredes’s involvement in significant legal matters, particularly those involving Jefferson Farfán and his association with Yahaira Plasencia.
Magaly pointed out that Paredes appears to be initiating an “orchestrated campaign against Magaly Medina.” Such assertions indicate that Paredes has not only switched sides but is publicly advertising his intention to take legal actions against her.
Ethical Violations
Attorney Fernando Ugaz emphasized the ethical implications of Paredes’s current legal work, citing Article 41 of the Bar Association’s code of ethics. This article states that a lawyer should not take on cases that substantially relate to previous clients without their explicit consent. “There exists a clear conflict of interest,” Ugaz asserted, adding that Paredes’s participation in current processes could violate the fundamental principles of legal ethics.
Magaly responded firmly, “I have not given him authorization nor have I spoken to him about this issue.” This declaration reinforces the notion that Paredes may be breaching ethical guidelines by representing interests that conflict with those of his former client.
Possible Legal Actions
During the broadcast, Magaly raised the question of potential legal recourse. Ugaz affirmed that they could indeed report Paredes to the Bar Association, stating, “These acts that Dr. Iván Paredes conducts are reportable.”
Ugaz noted the significant connection between the ongoing cases and the Farfán matter, reinforcing that the allegations against Magaly are deeply intertwined with her past legal representation by Paredes.
Reflecting on Professional Relationships
Beyond the technical legalities, Magaly shared her personal feelings about the unexpected turn of events. She expressed disappointment and surprise, especially since Paredes was once her trusted lawyer. “I respect him for having been my lawyer,” she acknowledged. Yet, she also questioned Paredes’s recent career moves, suggesting that his attempts to revive his legal career perhaps motivated these actions.
Conclusion
In a drama that highlights conflict within the legal and entertainment worlds, Magaly Medina remains resolute in her stance against her former lawyer. As this situation unfolds, it raises essential questions about legal ethics and accountability, making it a topic to watch closely in the coming days.