The tragic assassination of Miguel Uribe Turbay , a prominent senator and presidential candidate, has raised serious questions about the effectiveness of security protocols in Colombia. Following the assassination on August 11—a grim conclusion to a life marked by political ambition and public service— Augusto Rodríguez , the director of the National Protection Unit (UNP), has come forward to defend his agency against criticism regarding its failure to protect Uribe Turbay.
Rodríguez emphasized that both internal investigations and external audits have been initiated to evaluate the security measures that were in place during the days leading up to the tragic event. Uribe Turbay was shot twice in the skull and once in the leg, which ultimately led to his untimely demise two months after being attacked in western Bogotá.
Now you can follow us inFacebook and in ourWhatsApp Channel
Rodríguez stressed that the UNP had an appropriate protection scheme in place that included available vehicles, armaments, and personnel assignments according to protocol. “We have reviewed all our processes, our protocols, and found that we have complied with everything pertaining to Uribe Turbay’s coverage. They had the right equipment, functional vehicles, and weapons,” he asserted in a press briefing.
While defending himself from accusations, Rodríguez described the distribution of forces on the day of the attack as “unfortunate coincidences.” He explained that some officers were absent due to their need to attend to personal matters, which has become a focal point of the ongoing inquiry. “There was a distribution in coordination that the head of security had, who was a police officer working with Uribe Turbay himself to determine how resources were allocated. Unfortunately, some personnel were not present,” he added, further stressing the complexities of keeping individuals safe in unpredictable environments.

These new details have also prompted the current presidential administration , led by Gustavo Petro , to convene an Extraordinary Security Council at the Nariño House. The aim of this council is to critically evaluate the current protection frameworks afforded to presidential candidates and to ensure a safer environment for political figures. The UNP has diligently responded to all requests concerning enhanced security measures for various candidates following the tragic assassinaton.
Rodríguez reiterated that it is imperative to ensure the principal’s protection before extending measures to family members. “The main person’s coverage should always come first. Dispersing the scheme led to lapses in protection at crucial moments,” he insisted in an effort to clarify the prevailing misconceptions around the security protocols in this case.
Ultimately, Miguel Uribe Turbay’s tragic fate highlights severe deficiencies in the security infrastructure for political figures in Colombia. The ongoing investigations remain crucial for accountability and the improvement of such protections, ensuring that future candidates are better shielded from violence.

