The General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) has launched a disciplinary file<\/strong> against Judge Juan Carlos Peinado following his controversial order to impose the withdrawal of Bego\u00f1a G\u00f3mez’s passport. Notably, G\u00f3mez is the wife of Spain’s President, Pedro S\u00e1nchez. This case has gained significant attention, not merely because of the measures taken, but particularly due to the wording used by Judge Peinado in justifying these actions.<\/p>\n Judge Peinado’s order mandated that Bego\u00f1a G\u00f3mez surrender her passport and report to the court every 15 days. The judicial controversy erupted primarily over Peinado’s assertion that the police, specifically his personal bodyguards, could potentially assist G\u00f3mez in a “possible escape”<\/strong> either at their own discretion or under orders from superior officials. This statement has sparked outrage and unrest within the National Police community.<\/p>\n The backlash from law enforcement was swift and significant. Major police unions\u2014most notably Jupol\u2014decried Peinado’s claims as a \u201cgenuine barbarity\u201d<\/strong> and expressed their disdain at being questioned by a respected figure in the judiciary. They argue that such rhetoric undermines the integrity and professionalism of the State Security Forces, leading to potential erosion of public trust in law enforcement.<\/p>\n Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska did not remain silent on the matter, sending a formal letter to the CGPJ regarding the incident. Meanwhile, defense representatives for Bego\u00f1a G\u00f3mez have objected vehemently, claiming she was unaware of the latest judicial measures until they were disclosed in the media, suggesting a violation of her right to defense.<\/strong><\/p>\n Given the heated nature of the situation, the CGPJ, chaired by Isabel Perell\u00f3, convened electronically to evaluate potential sanctions against Judge Peinado for what could be perceived as overreach. During these discussions, no consensus was reached, prompting Perell\u00f3 to call an emergency meeting for further deliberation.<\/p>\n A significant point in the deliberation process was the casting vote<\/strong> by Perell\u00f3, which broke the tie among CGPJ members\u2014four in favor and four opposed to the disciplinary action. Following this crucial decision, the council instructed representatives to investigate whether Peinado’s statements about police conduct constitute a serious violation as defined in Article 418.5 of the Spanish Judicial Organization Law (LOPJ).<\/p>\n Importantly, the opening of the disciplinary file does not stall the judicial processes already underway. In fact, while CGPJ members were in internal discussions, Judge Peinado moved forward, ordering Bego\u00f1a G\u00f3mez to submit her passport by Wednesday at 6 p.m. This timing coincidentally aligns with Pedro S\u00e1nchez’s appearance in Congress, where he is expected to address allegations concerning corruption within his governmental party.<\/p>\n As this story continues to unfold, the implications of Judge Peinado\u2019s comments and actions will resonate across both judicial and political landscapes in Spain. The CGPJ’s next steps will be keenly observed as they navigate the interplay of judicial integrity and political ramifications surrounding this high-profile case.<\/p>\nThe Reason for the Disciplinary File<\/h3>\n
Police Unions Respond<\/h3>\n
Political Reactions<\/h3>\n
The CGPJ’s Response<\/h3>\n
Ongoing Judicial Proceedings<\/h3>\n
Conclusion<\/h3>\n