## \u201cI Was Not Part of Any Criminal Plan to Kill Him\u201d<\/p>\n
Mariano Perroni, one of the accused in the trial surrounding Diego Maradona’s death, has passionately defended his conduct during the former football star’s final days. In an emotional testimony, Perroni stated, “I always made suggestions for the best way for the patient to live within the home,” clarifying his role was centered on advising rather than executing any actions. He insisted, \u201cI was never part of any criminal plan to kill him,\u201d emphasizing that his recommendations were normal for better patient care.<\/p>\n
### Clarifying His Role in Care<\/p>\n
Perroni explained his role in Maradona’s home care as largely administrative and coordination-focused. Assigned to support Maradona post-surgery, he documented his efforts to secure around-the-clock nursing care. “I called more than 40 [nurses]. Not everyone wanted to take the case,” he said, underscoring the strenuous efforts he made to find the right support for Maradona.<\/p>\n
He recalled how when the need for increased nursing hours arose, adjustments were made to ensure Diego received adequate attention. Yet, he reiterated, \u201cI never had access to the house, I never entered. I didn’t know anyone,\u201d distancing himself from any personal responsibility in Maradona’s care.<\/p>\n
## The Testimony Continues<\/p>\n
During the resumed trial, Perroni also acknowledged his gratitude toward his lawyer, Miguel \u00c1ngel Pierri, who provided not only legal advice but emotional support throughout the process. He shared a poignant interaction with Dr. Cahe, a prominent doctor from Maradona’s medical team, who remarked, “What an unfair mess they got you into,” highlighting the tangled web of accountability surrounding Maradona\u2019s medical oversight.<\/p>\n
### Trial’s Special Schedule<\/p>\n
In a noteworthy update, the judges confirmed that the trial will continue during the judicial fair, with hearings set for July 20 and July 27. This decision underscores the urgency and ongoing nature of the proceedings, as both sides prepare for further evidence and testimonies.<\/p>\n
## Audio Evidence Presented<\/p>\n
The trial also saw the introduction of audio recordings from the discharge meeting, which featured conversations between treating doctors, Maradona\u2019s family, and medical authorities discussing the specifics of Diego’s rehabilitation plan. This material, sourced from the prosecution, is vital for understanding the context and decisions made around Maradona\u2019s treatment.<\/p>\n
## Conflicting Testimonies and Accountability<\/p>\n
Compelling contradictions emerged during the trial as Dr. Forlini claimed she never requested necessary equipment, while Dr. Cosachov asserted that an ambulance was indeed included in their hospitalization order. Tensions escalated in the courtroom as the two doctors defended their positions, illuminating the fragmented communication that marred Maradona’s post-care.<\/p>\n
### Their Crucial Claims<\/p>\n
Dr. Forlini maintained, “I never received that paper,” creating a crucial point of contention with Cosachov who responded, “I have nothing against you, Nancy. But I don’t find it surprising at all that you say the same thing as Charovsky.” This ongoing dialogue encapsulates the struggle for accountability amidst the complexities of Maradona\u2019s care, ultimately raising questions about the oversight provided in such an essential period of his life.<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
The trial continues to unfold, with each testimony adding depth to the intricate narrative surrounding Diego Maradona’s final days and the actions of those involved in his care.<\/p>\n