<\/p>\n
The Dilemma: Tools or Traps?<\/h2>\n
One notable case that stirred controversy was the \u00a0Cluely\u00a0 Startup, founded by two students from \u00a0Columbia University\u00a0. They used an undetectable AI tool to navigate technical interviews. Upon learning of this deception, the university suspended them for \u201c\u00a0academic dishonesty\u00a0.\u201d This incident sparked a heated debate: Are tools like calculators and spell checkers also dishonest? Or are they simply part of modern work culture?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Adapting to Increasingly Tough Interviews<\/h2>\n
In response to such practices, companies have begun to \u00a0tighten\u00a0 their interview processes. As noted by industry analyst \u00a0Gergely Orosz\u00a0, some companies are redesigning their interview formats. They now emphasize more \u00a0open-ended\u00a0 questions that require logical reasoning rather than rote memorization. This reduces the susceptibility of interviews to “copy-and-paste” tactics derived from training sites like Leetcode<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Orosz emphasized that \u00a0large companies\u00a0 have made it mandatory for interviewers to report any suspicions of cheating throughout the selection process, not just in technical assessments. Consequently, interviews are evolving to become less vulnerable to the misuse of AI.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n For instance, candidates are now often required to share their entire screen while disabling background filters during interviews. As reported by India Today<\/a>, Amazon has made it clear that \u201cthe use of unauthorized assistance during interviews will lead to immediate disqualification.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The challenge for many tech companies lies in navigating this dilemma: should they \u00a0prohibit\u00a0 the use of AI in interviews, even as they encourage its use in daily work tasks? While some companies maintain a strict no-AI policy, others, like \u00a0Meta\u00a0, have adopted a contrasting approach by allowing candidates to use AI during specific job interviews. According to their guidelines, candidates can treat AI tools as they would in their everyday engineering tasks.<\/p>\n Companies such as \u00a0Canva\u00a0 also encourage the use of AI tools during interviews to better assess candidates\u2019 skills in this emerging area. Shopify engineering manager \u00a0Farhan Thawar\u00a0 recently commented during an interview that his team allows candidates to use whatever resources they want. Thawar appreciates this approach because it enables him to evaluate the \u00a0code\u00a0 generated by candidates using AI, and engage them in discussions about the quality of that output.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Amid rising concerns over fraud, many companies are reconsidering their interview formats, favoring \u00a0face-to-face\u00a0 interactions. Prominent tech firms like \u00a0Google\u00a0, \u00a0Cisco\u00a0, and \u00a0McKinsey\u00a0 have reintroduced at least one in-person round in their hiring processes. A \u00a0Gartner report\u00a0 revealed that \u00a072.4%\u00a0 of hiring managers are doing the same to combat fraud, as in-person interviews provide a better platform for assessing candidates’ reasoning, communication, and immediate reactions.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cTelework and advancements in AI have facilitated unprecedented opportunities for fraudulent candidates to infiltrate the hiring process,\u201d remarked \u00a0Scott McGuckin\u00a0, Cisco’s Vice President of Global Talent Acquisition.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n As the \u00a0interview landscape\u00a0 continually transforms in response to AI technologies, the focus is shifting towards ensuring candidates not only possess the required skills but demonstrate the integrity that companies seek in their future employees.<\/p>\n Image | Pexels (Edmond Dant\u00e8s<\/a>)<\/p>\n![\"If](\"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/1758299940_390_They-do-it-for-them-and-companies-are-responding.jpeg\"\/)
\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\nProhibition vs. Innovation<\/h2>\n
The Return of In-Person Interviews<\/h2>\n