Not all of the mountain is oregano and not all text-based social networks are X. After the arrival of \u00a0Elon Musk\u00a0 at X, formerly known as Twitter, many users sought greener pastures. In response, \u00a0Mark Zuckerberg\u00a0, CEO of \u00a0Meta\u00a0, opened the doors to \u00a0Threads\u00a0. Now, two years since its launch, Threads has emerged as a formidable rival to X, showcasing impressive growth and user engagement.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Recently, Zuckerberg and \u00a0Adam Mosseri\u00a0, the CEO of Instagram, confirmed via their official profiles that Threads has reached a remarkable milestone: \u00a0400 million\u00a0 monthly active users (MAUs). This achievement is particularly notable given that the platform ended 2024 with just over \u00a0275 million\u00a0 users and soared to \u00a0350 million\u00a0 by April. This rapid growth underscores Threads’ escalating popularity in the social media landscape.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Understanding monthly active users (MAUs) is crucial; this metric allows us to gauge a platform’s performance and overall health. An increase in MAUs is generally viewed as a positive sign, indicating that the social network is attracting and retaining users effectively.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Current data about X comes from recent statements by \u00a0Linda Yaccarino\u00a0, its former CEO. As of April 2025, X reported \u00a0600 million\u00a0 MAUs. However, its growth appears to be slowing. In \u00a0September 2024\u00a0, X had \u00a0570 million\u00a0 MAUs, which increased only slightly to \u00a0586 million\u00a0 by January of the following year. While X maintains a higher overall user count than Threads, the latter exhibits a much more rapid growth trajectory.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
While X currently leads in monthly active users, Threads shows greater potential for future growth. Under Musk\u2019s leadership, X has likely reached its peak, at least in terms of its previous iteration as Twitter.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
However, we should take these numbers cautiously, as both sets of data come from the CEOs of the respective platforms, making them inherently biased.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Furthermore, third-party data reinforces the argument for Threads\u2019 escalating popularity. According to \u00a0SimilarWeb\u00a0, both Threads and X have comparable daily active users (DAUs). As of June 2025, X’s mobile app had \u00a0132 million\u00a0 DAUs (15.2% decrease from the previous year), while Threads reported \u00a0115.1 million\u00a0 DAUs, signifying a \u00a0127.8%\u00a0 increase year-over-year. However, the scenario shifts when we look at website usage: X attracted \u00a0145.8 million\u00a0 daily visits, while Threads only gathered \u00a06.9 million\u00a0.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In terms of user \u00a0engagement\u00a0, according to \u00a0Apptopia\u00a0, Threads also edges out X. Threads users access the app about \u00a06.6 times a day\u00a0, with sessions lasting an average of \u00a0190 seconds\u00a0 each. In contrast, X users log in \u00a07.3 times daily\u00a0 but spend an average of only \u00a0150 seconds\u00a0 per session. On a more granular level, Threads users dedicate around \u00a021 minutes\u00a0 daily to the app, while X users spend roughly \u00a018 minutes\u00a0. This indicates that, although X has a larger user base, Threads manages to keep its users engaged for a longer duration.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Threads benefits from significant user traction through its integration with Instagram.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The meteoric rise of Threads can be attributed in part to its strategic integration with \u00a0Instagram\u00a0. Users of Instagram often see Threads posts in their feeds, enabling seamless interconnection between both platforms. This integration allows users to link their profiles and even receive \u00a0push notifications\u00a0 for Threads content on Instagram. Meta has leveraged its vast resources effectively, capitalizing on its existing user base to drive Threads’ growth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Another contender in the social media arena is \u00a0Bluesky\u00a0, which has garnered significant attention. Currently, it boasts \u00a038.2 million\u00a0 registered users. However, actual user engagement appears lower than that of Threads or X. API data indicates that only \u00a0600,000 to 700,000\u00a0 users actively post content, while about \u00a01.2 million\u00a0 engage with posts. Thus, Bluesky still trails behind the more established platforms.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In conclusion, Threads\u2019 noteworthy growth and increasing user engagement present it as a serious rival to X. With strategic integration with Instagram and a strong focus on user retention, Threads showcases the potential to reshape the competitive landscape of social media. As the digital environment continues to evolve, the success of Threads may serve as a bellwether for future trends in user engagement and platform growth.<\/p>\n