{"id":152990,"date":"2025-07-03T05:18:33","date_gmt":"2025-07-03T05:18:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/congress-speeds-up-the-reform-of-its-regulations-against-pseudo-journalists-and-plans-to-approve-it-this-month-in-two-plenary-sessions\/"},"modified":"2025-07-03T05:18:34","modified_gmt":"2025-07-03T05:18:34","slug":"congress-speeds-up-the-reform-of-its-regulations-against-pseudo-journalists-and-plans-to-approve-it-this-month-in-two-plenary-sessions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/congress-speeds-up-the-reform-of-its-regulations-against-pseudo-journalists-and-plans-to-approve-it-this-month-in-two-plenary-sessions\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress speeds up the reform of its regulations against &#8220;pseudo-journalists&#8221; and plans to approve it this month in two plenary sessions."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div>\n<div class=\"visual__image image-initial-width\"><picture><source  media=\"(min-width: 1000px)\"\/><source  media=\"(min-width: 768px)\"\/><source  media=\"(min-width: 580px)\"\/><source  media=\"(min-width: 350px)\"\/><source  media=\"(min-width: 80px)\"\/><\/picture><\/div>\n<h2>The Need for Reform in Parliamentary Press Regulations<\/h2>\n<p>In recent years, there has been a growing concern regarding the behavior of certain <strong>accredited journalists<\/strong> in the <strong>Spanish Parliament<\/strong>. In response, the Spanish Socialist Workers&#8217; Party (<strong>PSOE<\/strong>) and its parliamentary allies are pushing forward a significant reform of the Congress <strong>Regulations<\/strong>. This proposal aims to impose sanctions on journalists who disrupt parliamentary functions, labeling them as &#8220;pseudoperiodistas,&#8221; a term that underscores the party&#8217;s intent to differentiate between professional journalism and disruptive behavior. <\/p>\n<h2>Understanding the Context of Reform<\/h2>\n<p>The reform comes after a series of <strong>incidents<\/strong> involving accredited journalists from digital platforms who have crossed professional boundaries. Their confrontations with politicians and other officials have raised alarm among professional journalism groups. These groups advocate for measures to protect the integrity of parliamentary reporting. The proposed reforms aim to establish a <strong>framework<\/strong> for reinforcing professional conduct while acknowledging the vital role the press plays in a democratic society.<\/p>\n<p>This initiative is backed by multiple political factions, including <strong>Sumar<\/strong>, <strong>ERC<\/strong>, <strong>Junts<\/strong>, <strong>Bildu<\/strong>, <strong>PNV<\/strong>, <strong>BNG<\/strong>, and the <strong>Canarian Coalition<\/strong>. The core aim is to ensure press freedom while simultaneously curbing unacceptable behavior that undermines the credibility of journalism. The new regulations are not seen as attempts to stifle freedom of the press but rather as a means to protect it from potential <strong>abuse<\/strong> by individuals masquerading as journalists.<\/p>\n<h2>Proposed Changes to Journalist Accreditation<\/h2>\n<p>The Congress Regulation, originally established in <strong>1982<\/strong>, has long governed the accreditation of journalists. This reform seeks to refine the existing accreditation process, emphasizing clearer guidelines for renewal and the conduct expected of accredited journalists. Key components of the proposed reform include the establishment of a <strong>Parliamentary Communication Advisory Council<\/strong>. This council will consist of representatives from various political groups and professional journalism communities, tasked with recommending sanctions for reporters who contravene established norms.<\/p>\n<h2>Enforcement of Parliamentary Courtesy<\/h2>\n<p>One of the more stringent aspects of the reforms is the mandatory adherence to &#8220;rules of parliamentary courtesy.&#8221; Accredited journalists will face penalties if they disregard these guidelines, with potential sanctions including temporary suspensions or even permanent revocation of their credentials. Compliance with these conduct rules aims to establish a harmonious working environment where journalists can perform their duties without unnecessary obstructions or confrontations.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal emphasizes that all recordings must be authorized, further underlining respect for parliamentary proceedings. This aspect is crucial in maintaining a level of decorum expected in such a significant democratic setting.<\/p>\n<h2>The Legislative Process Ahead<\/h2>\n<p>The legislative journey for this reform has already begun, with initial discussions held at the <strong>Plenary of Congress<\/strong> on <strong>May 20<\/strong>. Proponents of the reform have requested expedited processing, aiming for approval during the summer session. This urgency is indicative of the PSOE&#8217;s commitment to seeing these changes implemented promptly.<\/p>\n<p>Despite showing considerable support\u2014178 signatures from deputies\u2014the reform has faced opposition. The <strong>Popular Party (PP)<\/strong> and <strong>Vox<\/strong> have presented alternative proposals, challenging key components of the proposed changes. The PP contends that the Congress president possesses sufficient authority to maintain order and discipline within the chamber, arguing against the necessity for this reform. They seek to eliminate provisions concerning the regulation of journalist accreditations, insisting that existing powers are sufficient to handle disruptions.<\/p>\n<h2>The Diverging Visions of PP and Vox<\/h2>\n<p>The PP\u2019s alternative proposal aims to preserve the president&#8217;s unilateral authority to manage public order without devolving this responsibility to other chambers. They argue that transferring such powers could result in conflicts and inefficiencies. Vox, conversely, has taken a more radical approach, aiming to reform various aspects of parliamentary function. This includes a call to abolish co-official languages and introduce stricter regulations for deputy conduct and voting rights.<\/p>\n<p>Their proposals reflect broader concerns regarding the <strong>distribution<\/strong> of power within the parliamentary system and have sparked intense debates among political factions.<\/p>\n<h2>Looking Ahead: The Path to Final Approval<\/h2>\n<p>As discussions advance, the modified proposals from both the PP and Vox are set to be debated and voted on soon. With the significant backing for the PSOE\u2019s reforms, it appears likely that their proposal will continue to move forward. The legislative process includes further debate on amendments before concluding discussions in a <strong>public session<\/strong> on <strong>July 17<\/strong>. The final steps will culminate in a vote scheduled for later this month, with the hope that new regulations will be in effect by the start of the next parliamentary session.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, the initiative by the PSOE and its allies to reform journalist accreditation in Congress reflects a critical need to balance press freedom with responsible reporting practices. By establishing guidelines and regulatory frameworks, the reform aims to uphold the integrity of journalism while maintaining the efficiency of parliamentary operations. As the legislative process unfolds, all eyes will be on how these changes manage to secure the trust of both the media and the public while safeguarding democratic values.<\/p>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/category\/general\/\" rel=\"dofollow\">General News &#8211; 2<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Need for Reform in Parliamentary Press Regulations In recent years, there has been a growing concern regarding the behavior of certain accredited journalists in the Spanish Parliament. In response, the Spanish Socialist Workers&#8217; Party (PSOE) and its parliamentary allies are pushing forward a significant reform of the Congress Regulations. This proposal aims to impose [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":152991,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[9123,1699,2751,1620,38029,38028,2060,2800,20473,38013],"class_list":["post-152990","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mazagine","tag-approve","tag-congress","tag-month","tag-plans","tag-plenary","tag-pseudojournalists","tag-reform","tag-regulations","tag-sessions","tag-speeds"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152990","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152990"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152990\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/152991"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teknomers.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}