The Shimano XTR M9200  marks Shimano’s entry into the world of  wireless electronic shifting  for mountain bikes. As soon as we received the group, we couldn’t resist weighing each component to determine its  exact weight . Are you like us, someone who never parts with their scale? If so, this will certainly interest you!

If you’re looking for all the technical details about the new Shimano XTR M9200 Di2 group, head over to our comprehensive article that explains everything you need to know: New Arrival Test | Shimano XTR M9200 Di2: Finally Embracing Wireless Electronics!

Here, we will focus  exclusively on the weights  of the different components we currently possess. We will update this information as we acquire more versions of the parts from the group, since it is offered in two variations:  XC and Trail/Enduro , of which not all components were available at launch.

Derailleur XTR M9250 Di2 SGS

Weighing in at  415g , the new Shimano XTR Di2 derailleur is well-positioned, matching the  Sram XX SL . For complete accuracy, you should add about  30g for the derailleur hanger , which is necessary for the Shimano XTR, whereas the Sram mounts directly onto the frame. It’s worth noting that the mechanical XTR M9100 derailleur weighed just over  200g . Although one must add the weight of a cable and sheath assembly, the electronic option is currently heavier.

The small battery weighs  23g , included in the derailleur weight mentioned above.

Shifter XTR SW-M9250R Di2

The  XTR Di2 wireless shifter  is impressively hefty on the scale, coming in at nearly  100g . This is similar to a mechanical XTR shifter and nearly double that of the Sram AXS Pod, just for comparison. However, when compared to the first-generation AXS shifter, the difference is only  15g .

Cassette XTR CS-M9200

While the finish and some details differ between the 12-speed cassettes of the  9100 generation  and the new  XTR M9200 group , the balance results show an identical weight of  367g  in both cases. However, the new Shimano XTR M9200 with  9-45 teeth  is claimed to be  70g lighter . As of this writing, we have not yet been able to verify this claim.

Crankset XTR FC-M9220

We were expecting to receive the  XTR FC-M9200 crankset , the lightest XC version, but instead, we received the reinforced  9220 crankarms . This explains their seemingly heavy weight. Nevertheless, the weights remain almost identical to those of the previous XTR, which also weighed just under  600g  in its reinforced version. The XC version of the M9100 weighed around  510g , and we can expect the new M9200 XC to fall within similar weights.

Chain

There are no changes in this area; however, we include it for completeness.

Pedals XTR M9200

While their shape has evolved compared to the previous generation, the weight on the scale remains nearly identical, within  3g  favoring the previous generation of XT pedals in their XC version.

Wheels XTR WH-M9200

The fantastic surprise of the new XTR group is that the XC configuration wheels weigh only  1170g  per pair on our scale, compared to the  1200g  claimed, including tubeless rim tape and valves. This impressive score was previously thought to be exclusive to more exotic component builds. The titanium spokes likely play a significant role, but the rims and hubs are undoubtedly lightweight as well to achieve such a score. In short, this marks a significant return for Shimano into high-end wheels, after a long hiatus from the segment.

Brakes XTR BR-M9220

We have not yet had the opportunity to weigh the XC M9200 brakes, which remain close to those of the previous generation. However, we did receive the  trail/enduro M9220 version , which is entirely new. Weight is not the primary concern for this model, which prioritize power and superior ergonomics. With less than  300g  for a front set, uncut hoses included, it is about  ten grams heavier  than its predecessor, but remains competitive with the competition.

In conclusion, the new  XTR M9200  transmission is well-regarded in terms of weight but does not compete with the peak offerings from its main rival, Sram, specifically the  XX SL T-Type . Our entire XTR group is nearly  100g heavier  than the XX, which is also high-end but designed for heavier usage. However, it is slightly lighter than the  XO . Upon analyzing the weight specifics, the crankset is where the  notable difference  lies. It is logical as the crank arms are aluminum; however, it’s worth mentioning that we intended to receive an “XC” M9200 transmission but ended up with the  reinforced  model 9220 designed for more aggressive riding. In memory, the M9100 crankset weighed around  515g , placing the XTR nearly at par with the Sram XX. Not bad at all!

For all the insights into the new  Shimano XTR M9200 Di2 group , including our first impressions on the terrain, check out our full article: New Arrival Test | Shimano XTR M9200 Di2: Finally Embracing Wireless Electronics!



General News – 2