






The Shimano XTR M9200 marks Shimano’s entry into the world of wireless electronic shifting for mountain bikes. As soon as we received the group, we couldn’t resist weighing each component to determine its exact weight . Are you like us, someone who never parts with their scale? If so, this will certainly interest you!
If you’re looking for all the technical details about the new Shimano XTR M9200 Di2 group, head over to our comprehensive article that explains everything you need to know: New Arrival Test | Shimano XTR M9200 Di2: Finally Embracing Wireless Electronics!
Here, we will focus exclusively on the weights of the different components we currently possess. We will update this information as we acquire more versions of the parts from the group, since it is offered in two variations: XC and Trail/Enduro , of which not all components were available at launch.
Derailleur XTR M9250 Di2 SGS
Weighing in at 415g , the new Shimano XTR Di2 derailleur is well-positioned, matching the Sram XX SL . For complete accuracy, you should add about 30g for the derailleur hanger , which is necessary for the Shimano XTR, whereas the Sram mounts directly onto the frame. It’s worth noting that the mechanical XTR M9100 derailleur weighed just over 200g . Although one must add the weight of a cable and sheath assembly, the electronic option is currently heavier.
The small battery weighs 23g , included in the derailleur weight mentioned above.
Shifter XTR SW-M9250R Di2
The XTR Di2 wireless shifter is impressively hefty on the scale, coming in at nearly 100g . This is similar to a mechanical XTR shifter and nearly double that of the Sram AXS Pod, just for comparison. However, when compared to the first-generation AXS shifter, the difference is only 15g .
Cassette XTR CS-M9200
While the finish and some details differ between the 12-speed cassettes of the 9100 generation and the new XTR M9200 group , the balance results show an identical weight of 367g in both cases. However, the new Shimano XTR M9200 with 9-45 teeth is claimed to be 70g lighter . As of this writing, we have not yet been able to verify this claim.
Crankset XTR FC-M9220
We were expecting to receive the XTR FC-M9200 crankset , the lightest XC version, but instead, we received the reinforced 9220 crankarms . This explains their seemingly heavy weight. Nevertheless, the weights remain almost identical to those of the previous XTR, which also weighed just under 600g in its reinforced version. The XC version of the M9100 weighed around 510g , and we can expect the new M9200 XC to fall within similar weights.
Chain
There are no changes in this area; however, we include it for completeness.
Pedals XTR M9200
While their shape has evolved compared to the previous generation, the weight on the scale remains nearly identical, within 3g favoring the previous generation of XT pedals in their XC version.
Wheels XTR WH-M9200
The fantastic surprise of the new XTR group is that the XC configuration wheels weigh only 1170g per pair on our scale, compared to the 1200g claimed, including tubeless rim tape and valves. This impressive score was previously thought to be exclusive to more exotic component builds. The titanium spokes likely play a significant role, but the rims and hubs are undoubtedly lightweight as well to achieve such a score. In short, this marks a significant return for Shimano into high-end wheels, after a long hiatus from the segment.
Brakes XTR BR-M9220
We have not yet had the opportunity to weigh the XC M9200 brakes, which remain close to those of the previous generation. However, we did receive the trail/enduro M9220 version , which is entirely new. Weight is not the primary concern for this model, which prioritize power and superior ergonomics. With less than 300g for a front set, uncut hoses included, it is about ten grams heavier than its predecessor, but remains competitive with the competition.
In conclusion, the new XTR M9200 transmission is well-regarded in terms of weight but does not compete with the peak offerings from its main rival, Sram, specifically the XX SL T-Type . Our entire XTR group is nearly 100g heavier than the XX, which is also high-end but designed for heavier usage. However, it is slightly lighter than the XO . Upon analyzing the weight specifics, the crankset is where the notable difference lies. It is logical as the crank arms are aluminum; however, it’s worth mentioning that we intended to receive an “XC” M9200 transmission but ended up with the reinforced model 9220 designed for more aggressive riding. In memory, the M9100 crankset weighed around 515g , placing the XTR nearly at par with the Sram XX. Not bad at all!
For all the insights into the new Shimano XTR M9200 Di2 group , including our first impressions on the terrain, check out our full article: New Arrival Test | Shimano XTR M9200 Di2: Finally Embracing Wireless Electronics!
General News – 2

