The National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) has officially ruled out the implementation of digital voting for the upcoming general elections in April 2026. This decision has been characterized as necessary to ensure peace and trust among political entities and the electorate. Katiuska Valencia, an advisor to ONPE’s national leadership, emphasized that there is no confrontation with the National Elections Jury (JNE), clarifying this stance through a recent statement.
Why Digital Voting Was Suspended
ONPE’s decision came after careful evaluation of the electoral context, which is marked by a significant number of political organizations participating in the elections. Valencia explained that the suspension of digital voting aims at maintaining institutional consistency and circumventing potential technical difficulties that could arise in such a complex electoral environment.
The agency is prioritizing the stability, security, and transparency of the electoral system. Valencia reiterated that while digital tools could introduce operational vulnerabilities that might undermine confidence in the electoral process, ensuring an orderly and predictable election is paramount.
The Role of the ONPE and JNE
Addressing any perceived tension between ONPE and JNE, Valencia stated that both organizations collaborate under the constitutional framework, ensuring functionality within their distinct roles. The autonomy of JNE in overseeing the electoral process is fully respected and recognized by ONPE, further showcasing the cooperative dynamic between the two entities.
Technical and Institutional Criteria
According to the ONPE’s statement, the decision to suspend digital voting isn’t indicative of a setback in modernizing the electoral infrastructure. It stems from technical evaluations that take into account the security risks associated with implementing such systems amidst varying political interests.
The ONPE also aims to keep the electorate and political organizations informed about the technical and logistical advancements in preparation for the elections. The organization is on schedule with its proposed timeline and is actively working on logistical details, including defining the placement of political organizations on the voting cards.
Measures for Transparency
In a bid to enhance transparency during this electoral cycle, ONPE plans to receive an inaugural report from an international audit firm concerning the voting system on December 30. This report will help compare its findings with those published by existing supervisory bodies, aiming to bolster integrity in the electoral processes.
The technical team is currently reviewing JNE’s critical analysis of the electoral system to ensure compliance with constitutional mandates, reinforcing the commitment to a transparent and well-coordinated electoral process.
Conclusion: A Commitment to Stability
As the ONPE reinforces its pledge to uphold a stable electoral environment for the 2026 general elections, the agency stresses the importance of minimizing any contentious factors that might emerge. Through systematic evaluation and coordination, ONPE is devising comprehensive plans that strengthen public confidence in the electoral outcomes.
In summary, the decision to suspend digital voting reflects the ONPE’s commitment to transparency, stability, and security in Peru’s electoral system. The agency continues to work proactively with all stakeholders involved to ensure a smooth electoral process come April 2026.