– It is a question of a sexual assault that is still under investigation. This is what the head of prosecution in the Agder police district, Terje Kaddeberg Skaar, says. The episode is said to have taken place at a private child welfare institution in Sørlandet. According to the police, the affair happened at the end of March. According to the police, the boy must be below the criminal minimum age. He is being investigated for rape by an employee at the place where he himself lived. According to news’s information, the woman must have escaped from the house and sought refuge with neighbors. She should only have been wearing underwear. The woman is said to have explained that she had been raped and held captive. According to news’s sources, there must have been a decision that the boy had to be looked after by two people. Due to the ongoing investigation, the police will not comment on this now. The boy must have been back in the house the same evening. The incident is being investigated in the usual way, even though the boy is under criminal age. Photo: Hanne Rebecca Nilsen / news Taken care of by the child welfare service The boy is considered to be below the criminal minimum age. But according to news’s information, his actual age must be uncertain. Do the police have a safe age for the boy? – This is part of the investigation that we can not answer now, says Kaddeberg Skaar. Although the boy is considered to be under the age of criminal responsibility, the case is being investigated in the usual way. – A number of investigative steps have been taken in the case. Several police interrogations and a number of forensic investigations have been carried out. As well as collected various journals. Due to the boy’s young age, he cannot be punished. The police state that the child welfare service is responsible for the further follow-up. For the sake of the boy’s and the woman’s privacy, the police will not comment on the case any further. news has provided the private child welfare institution with all information. They do not want to comment, and refer to the duty of confidentiality.
ttn-69