During the trial on Wednesday, special investigator Rune Kenneth Bauge explained the activity on the woman’s Snapchat account. Funna can beat her legs under her explanation that the phone must have been hacked. The special investigator said everything indicates that it is only the woman’s phone that has logged into the Snapchat account, from her own network at home. Found nude video According to the indictment, the female teacher in her 30s sent nude videos and a nude photo of herself on Snapchat to four students aged 13 and 14 in 2021 and 2022. On the woman’s mobile phone, the police found screenshots of conversations on Snapchat, in addition to nude photos and nude videos. They found a nude video of a woman on two of the boys’ mobile phones. The woman, who was a teacher at a junior high school in the Bergen area, is accused of, in word or deed, having shown sexually offensive or other indecent behavior towards children under the age of 16. She has denied criminal liability. Had contact with the boys In a conversation presented in court, write the woman with the one boy. He writes: “Perhaps you are fun in bed too?” The woman replies: “I am. but then you must be 30 years ++”. The woman has admitted that she accepted the boys as friends on Snapchat, but that she did not start the conversations or send photos or videos. She claimed that the dialogue could at times be sexualizing on the part of the boys, and that she answered humorously so as not to seem judgmental. The defendant has admitted to having sold sexualized images on Snapchat, but that she asked for identification from those she sold to, to ensure that they were over 18 years of age. She believes the material went astray and was spread to her pupils. – I myself have never shared these films with the offended, said the woman. Photo: Oskar Rennedal / news According to the indictment, the defendant must have tried to bribe one of the boys to get a grade six, if he did not show the videos to anyone. Then she must have threatened to send people after the student, if he showed the videos to others. Made contact again after the indictment Screenshots show that this boy made contact with the woman in January 2024. There he wants to help her in connection with the court case, since “she is a kind lady”. The woman replied, but wrote that they could not have contact. She wrote that they could talk after the trial. GGut: Can I get you on snap again? (blush emoji) Teacher: I can’t talk to you anymore, sorry. Hope you understand (blushing emoji) GGut: You know you can trust me NAME FEMALE Teacher: (Laughing emoji) you’re funny (blushing emoji) you’re mad at me since I kind of threatened you….. But we can’t have any more contact . You don’t know how much trouble I have… (heart emoji) GGut: No but I’m the only one who can help you in this case too (big smile emoji) LTeacher: Yes tell the truth to your lawyer (heart emoji) But now can’t we have more contact (heart emoji) talk after the trial (blush emoji)Gut: You know I’m the only one who can help you, we should keep in touch GGut: No contact or contact I can help you Teacher: Of course I want you to help me tell the truth. But I can’t have any contact with you because of the case we have now. But if you can tell the truth to the lawyers, you will help me (heart emoji) Teacher: You can help me tell the truth. (heart emoji) Boy: What do I get out of it? (big smile emoji) GGut: For and tell the lawyer LTeacher: Helping an innocent person (blushing emoji) GGut: And… ? (big smile emoji) Teacher: We can’t talk anymore here (blush emoji) Appreciate if you tell the truth to your lawyer (heart emoji) Don’t believe in hacking The sister of the accused supports the woman in the claim that she had hacked Snapchat his account. She said that in December 2021 she was present when the defendant was logged out, and they saw that the Bitmoji moved on the map on Snapchat. – I saw it was in another place, and then it moved to where I was, said the sister. Special investigator Bauge said in court that they believe that there have been no other logins to the defendant’s account during the time period in question. They do not find in the log and history of the woman’s Snapchat that she has been logged out, something that would have happened if others had logged into her account. The investigator believes that the woman’s claim that the city position of the Bitmoji on the Snapchat map was changed is not true. The investigator believes it was the woman who had logged in on her own mobile phone. This is because the IP address that was logged in is linked to her home network. Moved home to the parents In Christmas 2021, the sister learned that pupils had been at the defendant’s home, and that one was going to make his sexual debut and wanted to learn. The sister told the defendant that she had to delete anything that had to do with sexual contact with the boys, and that they had to cut contact. – I discussed that you must delete this, that this is not okay, and that it was strange to be at home with her. I mentioned that parents had to be involved. The sister knew that the defendant had sent a nude photo to someone she had previously dated. She also said that the defendant must have said that guys were involved in ring-and-runs and sought out the defendant. – I know they were very active for a period, and that she moved home with her parents, said the sister. The case continues for an extra day in Hordaland district court next week. Published 12.06.2024, at 19.37
ttn-69
Accused teacher claims to have been hacked – the police find no evidence of this – news Vestland
