The ongoing immigration controversy in the United States reached a new peak when Federal Judge Brian Murphy ruled that  eight immigrants , all convicted of  violent crimes , were not to be expelled to  South Sudan , a nation grappling with conflict and economic hardship. Instead, these individuals will remain temporarily in  Djibouti , following this legal decision on May 22, 2025.

The government originally sought to fly these immigrants directly to South Sudan, yet faced backlash due to the lack of  consent  from their home nations for such expulsions. The list includes nationals from various countries:  two Burmese , a  Vietnamese , a  Laotian ,  two Cubans , a  Mexican , and a  South Sudanese .

On the basis of a ruling made by Judge Murphy, it was determined that the Trump administration had contravened a previous court decision regarding notification protocols. The judge criticized the late notice of less than  twenty-four hours  given for these individuals’ expulsion, especially to a country which carries travel warnings from the U.S. government.

Read also |
More than 10,000 Afghans living in the United States could be expelled after the revocation of their protection status

According to Judge Murphy’s verdict, in cases of  expulsion to a third country , the affected individuals must first be notified and afforded ample time—a  minimum of ten days —to lodge an appeal based on the  United Nations Convention Against Torture . This protocol aims to ensure that no individual is sent back to a country where they may face serious harm or persecution.

Accusations and Aftermath

Following the ruling, former President  Donald Trump  took to his social media platform to criticize the judge’s decision. He alleged that the magistrate had effectively  ordered  these individuals, described as  “the most violent criminals on earth,”  to remain in Djibouti instead of reaching South Sudan, where a significant  U.S. military base  is located. Trump expressed disappointment over what he termed a failure to allow these “monsters” to complete their journey.

Furthermore, the ruling allows six of the eight immigrants—the majority of whom are convicted  violent offenders —to assert their  fear  of torture or ill-treatment should they be returned to South Sudan. If the Department of  Homeland Security  deems these fears unfounded, individuals are entitled to  fifteen days  to seek a review of their expulsion process.

Read also |
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is alarmed by migrant expulsions in the United States

Judge Murphy’s ruling provided further instructions, granting the U.S. government discretion to either return these individuals to the United States or keep them in Djibouti, as long as they remain in the care of the  Department of Homeland Security .

Reported by The World with AFP

Reuse this content

Breaking News General – 1